Digitally Connecting People... Since 2014

THE VERDICT: BETWEEN TEMPOS CHAMBER AND FUTASU!

 

NB: Check below to access the full picture gallery of the open hearing that contained both the presiding judges, jury, Defendant , Plaintiff and the Observant!.

 

⚖ *FUTASUG JUDICIAL COUNCIL*🗡

THE VERDICT

_This hearing, based on the application for a writ submitted by the chamber on 11th of August , 2018 with ref no: FBA/TEM/018/012

*THE CASE BETWEEN TEMPOS CHAMBER AND THE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, AKURE STUDENTS UNION*

*JUDGEMENT*
Article 7 section 39 subsection 2 ” The judicial council shall interpret any section or part of the constitution in the first instance. It decision may be appealed against to the appeal court FUTASU…….”

*THE COURT’S INTERPRETATION AND VERDIT*

Sequel to ART IV, Section 7 the court rule that

*1.* any matriculated student that has interest in withholding the constitution should get it on request according to the constitution.

*2.* The payment of the swearing in fee used for the conducting of the swearing in to the union’s account and the process of waiting for disbursement of which an inadequate sum was verified to have been approved to be disbursed has caused insurmountable legal problems and constitutional inconsistency as the process hinders ;*a.* the judicial council from performing her duty freely and freed from influence from any external body or arm, *sequel to ART VII, Section 40* “( The Judicial council shall) regulate its own proceedings provided that it doesn’t conflict with the rules and principles of natural justice.
*b.* Affects the Independence of the judiciary to conduct *article vii subsection 39* (the judicial council) shall conduct all swearing-in program for every school/faculty, departmental, states, local Government student bodies and social association on campus.
*c.* Contradicts *article vii section 40 subsection 2* ”The Judicial Council shall commence work within 48hours of the receipt of any matter referred to it…”
*3.* The jury considers the direct use of swearing in fee for swearing in activities since its inception as an unwritten constitution and *therefore the court interprets article viii of the Futasu constitution which states* “ All revenue and monies due to the union shall first be paid into the Union’s bank account as follows:
*a.* Firstly, the swearing in ceremony is not a source of revenue to the union and should never be seen as such.
*b.* The swearing-in money is not a fee due to the union rather it is a function of the Judicial arm of the union to help organize swearing in for interested parties.
*Henceforth, the money received for organizing swearing by the swearing committee of the judicial council should be used directly in organizing the swearing and the following payers be granted:*
*a.* the incomplete swearing process for the elected executives should be completed as soon as possible.
*b* the halted swearing-in process should commence with immediate effect so as to ensure that all association executives start piloting the affairs of their association.

*JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED*

_Signed :-_
*FUTASU JUDICIAL COUNCIL*
*18/19 PARLIAMENTARY SESSION.*

—————————————————————————————————————

Here is the v erdict gallery for the hearing.

 

[Best_Wordpress_Gallery id=”33″ gal_title=”TEMPO CHAMBER VS FUTASU GALLERY”]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@ CampusCommunityNetwork2020

  • Powered by CCN_Tech

Home | Privacy Policy  | @CampusCommunityNetwork2020 | Powered by CCN_Tech 

×

Cart